Re: [boost] Why the integration branchmust remain clean, etc.

Subject: Re: [boost] Why the integration branchmust remain clean, etc.
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-08 17:54:18

On Tuesday 09 June 2009 00:53:31 Steven Watanabe wrote:
> AMDG
>
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
> > * Sandia-sun - tests fail to compile with the ridiculous error "int64_t
> > is not a member of boost", while other platforms, including
> > Sandia-Linux-sun, are fine.
>
> This isn't a ridiculous error at all.  Uses of int64_t should be
> protected by
> #ifndef BOOST_NO_INT64_T

Strange, I was sure these tests were successful some time ago, so 64-bit 
integers should be available on these compilers. Looking at Boost.Config 
tests, it looks like config tests aren't run on this compiler, so we actually 
don't know if BOOST_NO_INT64_T is valid.