|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Why the integration branch must remain clean, etc.
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-08 18:19:33
AMDG
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 June 2009 01:54:18 you wrote:
>
>> Looking at Boost.Config
>> tests, it looks like config tests aren't run on this compiler, so we
>> actually don't know if BOOST_NO_INT64_T is valid.
>>
>
> Oh, well, I'm being hasty. Sorry. The config test seems to pass. How did
> date_time tests pass before is still beyond me.
>
Well, thanks for making me look at the Boost.Config tests, anyway.
limits_test is failing because of a build system problem...
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk