Re: [boost] Proposal for #pragma once support

Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for #pragma once support
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-09 15:02:10

Vladimir Prus wrote
On Tuesday, June 09, 2009 2:58 PM
> Stewart, Robert wrote:
> >
> > I agree that a single manifest constant to control using
> > #pragma once is the right thing to do.  However, the scheme
> > you describe here puts too much onus on the Boost user.  Why
> > not define that manifest constant on the compiler command
> > line using  Boost.Build?  You can define that for each
> > compiler, unless I'm much mistaken.
>
> That will not help somebody who includes boost headers in his
> project, I think.

Yeah, I realized that in another reply.

_____
Rob Stewart                           robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software      using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  http://www.sig.com

IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.