Re: [boost] Proposal: Monotonic Containers

Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal: Monotonic Containers
From: Christian Schladetsch (christian.schladetsch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-10 01:59:10

Hello,

My apologies; I should have been less `succint`.

auto_buffer is, in fact, related, inasmuch as it also attempts to use the
stack for storage.

However, boost::monotonic provides an allocator that means that *all* STL
containers - and other ones - can use the stack for storage. Or the heap.

In that respect, auto_buffer<T> is a subset of the proposed
boost::monotonic::vector<T>.

Regards,
Christian.

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Christian Schladetsch <
christian.schladetsch_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> This is unrelated.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Francois Barel <frabar666_at_[hidden]>wrote:
>
>> Christian Schladetsch wrote:
>> > This is the first I have heard of  Thorsten Ottose's auto_buffer
>> proposal.
>> > Do you have a link to it?
>>
>> I believe the last links he posted are:
>> http://www.cs.aau.dk/~nesotto/boost/auto_buffer.zip
>

>> http://www.cs.aau.dk/~nesotto/boost/trunk/libs/auto_buffer/doc/html/
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> François
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>>
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>>
>
>