Subject: Re: [boost] boost::directx?
From: Christian Schladetsch (christian.schladetsch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-11 20:01:14
It may've been easy to miss in the scuffle, but I did actually provide a
demonstration of an inidcative library for inclusion into the proposed
It is in the vault at
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Nevin ":-]" Liber
> 2009/6/11 Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden]>
> > I agree with you that a library supporting DirectX in C++ would be
> >> very useful, but I also agree that such a library wouldn't be
> >> appropriate for boost, as it wouldn't be portable at all.
> > I don't see that as a good reason for not having it in boost.
> What library? I haven't seen *any* proposal for a DirectX library.
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but all I've seen so far was a proposal to have a
> boost::directx namespace now as a dumping ground should somebody in the
> world possibly choose to write a C++ DirectX related library that they
> wish to submit to Boost sometime in the future.
> Given that, there is nothing actually to implement, even if we as a
> community thought it was a good idea.
> Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]> (847) 691-1404
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk