Re: [boost] [boost::noncopyable] compiler warnings with the -Weffc++ flags

Subject: Re: [boost] [boost::noncopyable] compiler warnings with the -Weffc++ flags
From: Matt Calabrese (rivorus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-14 03:29:22

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Daniel Frey <d.frey_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On 13.06.2009, at 20:27, Matt Calabrese wrote:
> I haven't looked at it, but as you describe it, it sound as if they should
> just create their own tag type anyway as they are simply misusing
> noncopyable.
>

I think I agree in calling it a misuse, but I am always afraid to make such
a statement, especially given that I'm pretty sure Dave created both
noncopyable and the class_ interface. IMO, boost::noncopyable should not be
the tag used with class_, but realistically it doesn't matter too much
unless noncopyable is changed in the way described.

-- 
-Matt Calabrese