Subject: Re: [boost] [repost][threads] final decision on making parts of Boost.Threads header-only
From: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-15 17:23:34
Anthony Williams-4 wrote:
> joaquin_at_[hidden] writes:
>> A few weeks ago we had a discussion about the convenience
>> of making part of Boost.Threads, namely mutexes and locks,
>> header-only. Some (including Anthony Williams) supported the
>> idea, others disliked it:
>> What the final decision on this issue is? If positive (i.e. favoring
>> the change), can it be expected to be done for Boost 1.40?
> I haven't yet had a chance to investigate the issues. I will try and do
> so reasonably soon.
Hi Anthony, any chance the decision (if it's positive) be taken
and inplemented by Boost 1.40? As it happens, I have a bunch
of changes on Boost.Flyweight waiting for the resolution of
this issue. If the decision is negative or is postponed until
after 1.40 I'd like to know so as to defer my own changes too.
JoaquÃn M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz
TelefÃ³nica, InvestigaciÃ³n y Desarrollo
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-repost--threads--final-decision-on-making-parts-of-Boost.Threads-header-only-tp23594737p24042095.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk