Re: [boost] Proposal: Monotonic Containers

Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal: Monotonic Containers
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-16 08:46:35

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 16 June 2009, Christian Schladetsch wrote:
> In truth, this is a non-issue. The code you presented broke the standard;
> monotonic allocator didn't. Allocators are indeed allowed to have
> non-static members.

I hate to contradict your prejudices, but std c++03 containers are not 
required by the standard to support allocators which contain state, as has 
been noted several times already in this thread.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAko3lCwACgkQ5vihyNWuA4WjGwCg5kczlthFB0OcjnTTguvfEtUz
V8IAoL+CDoXumkOSb0F2KY2ERCN/K7VO
=yx/X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----