Subject: Re: [boost] Boost on solaris compiled and linked with libCstd
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-16 11:36:18
CREMARENCO Cosmin wrote:
> We have a solaris distribution of our software and we would like to
> use the boost libraries. In my understanding you recommend
> compiling and linking with stlport. However we depend on
> third party libraries that were built with libCstd, which
> is the old standard non-conformant library from sun.
> Sun docs clearly state that one should use either stlport or libCstd
> in the same program but not both.
> Also, we use sun studio 11.
> Now, we tried building boost with libCstd. A number of libraries
> built without problems: date, iostreams, prg, signals, system.
> In our application we use mostly header-only libraries and
> a small number of libraries that need to be linked with the
> We could get program-options (which we use extensively) to
> build by patching it (a tentative patch for 1.39 is attached).
> Of course one also needs to change tools/build/v2/tools/sun.jam in order
> to disable compiling and linking with stlport.
> My question is: if we send patches that allow boost to be
> compiled and linked with libCstd is there a chance that you
> will accept them in your main codeline?
A chance -- of course. But please be sure to explain exactly what is the
problem the compiler is having and produce minimal patch to address that
problem. Using svn.boost.org is the best way to submit patches.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk