Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [BOOST_ASSERT] any one against improving debug support?
From: Craig Henderson (cdm.henderson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-18 09:18:16

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [BOOST_ASSERT] any one against improving debug support?"
Previous message: Richard Webb: "Re: [boost] [hash][msvc 8.0]<boost/functional/hash/detail/float_functions.hpp> issuing a using namespace std directive?"
In reply to: Thorsten Ottosen: "[boost] [BOOST_ASSERT] any one against improving debug support?"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [BOOST_ASSERT] any one against improving debug support?"

> The current difinition of BOOST_ASSERT is a pain to use with
> the debugger and Boost.Test because it doesn't trigger a break-point.
Agreed.

> Does anyone object to defining it like this in <boost/assert.hpp>
>
> #if (BOOST_MSVC >= 1400)
> #include <crtdbg.h>
> #define BOOST_ASSERT _ASSERTE
> #endif
>

I'm very happy with this change.

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [BOOST_ASSERT] any one against improving debug support?"
Previous message: Richard Webb: "Re: [boost] [hash][msvc 8.0]<boost/functional/hash/detail/float_functions.hpp> issuing a using namespace std directive?"
In reply to: Thorsten Ottosen: "[boost] [BOOST_ASSERT] any one against improving debug support?"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [BOOST_ASSERT] any one against improving debug support?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk