Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [BOOST_ASSERT] any one against improving debug support?
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-21 03:52:31

Next message: Niels Dekker - address until 2010-10-10: "Re: [boost] SafeInt code proposal"
Previous message: Ross Levine: "Re: [boost] How to speed up the djikstra graph"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [BOOST_ASSERT] any one against improving debug support?"
Next in thread: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] [BOOST_ASSERT] any one against improving debug support?"

Peter Dimov skrev:
> Thorsten Ottosen:
>> Any objections to moving it to trunk?
>
> Yes. I do not support infighting between Boost libraries. If you have a
> problem with Boost.Test's behavior, BOOST_ASSERT is not the proper
> vehicle to express it.

There is another reason that _ASSERTE is better. It allows you
to ignore the assertions and continue execution in the debugger.

-Thorsten

Next message: Niels Dekker - address until 2010-10-10: "Re: [boost] SafeInt code proposal"
Previous message: Ross Levine: "Re: [boost] How to speed up the djikstra graph"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [BOOST_ASSERT] any one against improving debug support?"
Next in thread: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] [BOOST_ASSERT] any one against improving debug support?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk