Subject: Re: [boost] SafeInt code proposal
From: Raindog (raindog_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-21 20:31:50
Omer Katz wrote:
> There is indeed an overflow flag as mentioned, but the library should
> be platform independent, that's why it doesn't use it, though it will
> be probably faster.
You can write platform specializations so that on those platforms that
do support it, they are not penalized.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk