Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal: Monotonic Containers - Comparison with boost::pool, boost::fast_pool and TBB
From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-22 20:29:23
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Christian
>> Steven> The user cannot reliably release the memory allocated
>> by monotonic, if monotonic is used simultaneously in multiple
>> independent locations in a program.
> This is true, and why I added regions.
I think you should just not support some STL implementations.
We should have interprocess STL implementation moved to a new
namespace in boost. And have monotonic only supports C++0x allocators
This should make things simpler, more performant, and safer.
With a big warning in docs. And examples using boost.interprocess containers.
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk