Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] intrusive_ptr design question
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-06 17:11:25

Next message: Steven Ross: "Re: [boost] sorting floats by casting to integer"
Previous message: Vladimir Batov: "Re: [boost] [convert] Now with Boost.Parameter interface."
In reply to: Zachary Turner: "Re: [boost] intrusive_ptr design question"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] intrusive_ptr design question"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 06 July 2009, Zachary Turner wrote:
> Making major interface changes to existing libraries is always inherently
> risky but is there any reason that adding a policy to shared_ptr, with a
> default policy template argument that uses the existing ref counting
> strategy, would be bad?

The FAQ of the shared_ptr documentation addresses this question.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkpSaH0ACgkQ5vihyNWuA4VAjQCgkhd0/dlTLHukJxGADLC4DUfG
fmcAn27Ggst7A8rQcy/5mgfhnYYVczZT
=dcNY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Next message: Steven Ross: "Re: [boost] sorting floats by casting to integer"
Previous message: Vladimir Batov: "Re: [boost] [convert] Now with Boost.Parameter interface."
In reply to: Zachary Turner: "Re: [boost] intrusive_ptr design question"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] intrusive_ptr design question"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk