Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] shared_ptr template type

Subject: Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] shared_ptr template type
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-16 08:40:22

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 16 July 2009, Gottlob Frege wrote:
> - Maybe a more generic smart_ptr IS what we need (ie towards Loki
> policy-based SmartPtr).  Particularly since I've seen the same
> discussion about intrusive_ptr.  Or maybe not.  It is worth
> considering.  One ptr to rule them all?  (There would still be the
> specialized smart_ptr and intrusive_ptr of course, for simplicity and
> compatibility.)

I suggest searching the archives of this mailing list for background first.  
For example, there were many long threads about this in 2002, for example:

http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2001/12/22063.php

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkpfH7YACgkQ5vihyNWuA4V3PgCfVP9FB8/JEcwl+cOWEjFdLLW9
iMwAoIRxqrgZRT0K8eMzAxtR7dAfti2Z
=DFLH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----