Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a "Heterogenous Container" system?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-04 12:30:39
Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> I wasn't following the thread too closely, but I assumed the benefit of using
> size+alignment instead of type would be that you could reuse the same
> allocator with different types (as long as they had the same size and
> alignment). But since a type's size+alignment varies across platforms, you
> wouldn't be able to portably reuse such an allocator with different types
> (hence no portable benefit).
The size + alignment wouldn't be part of the type of the allocator, it
would be part of the arguments it receives to perform a given
allocation. (i.e., like posix_memalign).
But strictly speaking, the language doesn't even require to take into
account arbitrary alignments, you can just align to anything big enough,
like malloc and operator new do.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk