Subject: Re: [boost] [move] moving temporaries of copyable types
From: Christian Schladetsch (christian.schladetsch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-07 04:14:45
> To sump up, this approach allows moving from non-const rvalues but discards
> Visual 7.1 (I don't know if this should be still supported, though) and
> syntax is much uglier.
Like everyone, I have been in two minds about issues like this. My vote is
to discard 7.1.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk