Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-11 07:07:19
>>> i looked at uBLAS and the design seemed obsolete to me
>>> so i thought there could be a better approach then blindly following
>>> blas design
>> What is the issue with uBLAS?
> in my opinion a piece of software must be targeted to target users
> (excuse for a pun)
> i see a generic scientist as target user who already knows about
> matrix calculus and may not know about blas
> for such person writing
> u = A*v + w
> is much more natural than that of blas terms
> i think that user must focus on the design and the intent rather
> than how to express the thing in blas terms
Please note we're not talking about BLAS (C interface), but uBLAS which is
already a Boost vector/matrix library here:
You also need to be very careful with allowing "simple" expressions like
u = A*v + w
As traditionally these have awful performance due to the temporaries
There is also an ongoing Boost-sister-project to devise a "next generation"
matrix library for C++, but I've lost the link for the moment :-(
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk