Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: [boost] [move][container] Fast-track reviews for Move and Container?
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-14 02:14:20


As some others have mentioned, I'd like to ask if Boost.Move and
Boost.Container could meet the requirements for a Fast Track review (the
Review Wizard has the last word according to the Boost Formal Process,
but I'll like to see if there is consensus). Arguments:


-> Only one header (move.hpp)
-> Technique already in use in Boost (in several detail namespaces).
This is a proposal for a common implementation.
-> Boost-conformant implementation available in sandbox.


-> Most of them standard containers
-> Node containers are just wrappers over Boost.Intrusive
-> Most containers (all except stable_vector) were already reviewed for
-> Boost-conformant implementation available in sandbox.

I'll be specially interested in pushing Move first, so that we could
have move semantics for Boost 1.41.



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at