Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-14 13:49:21
on 14.08.2009 at 21:30
joel wrote :
>> i see no contra in you words
>> so i don't get why to drop nice subscript operator
> In fatc I just noticed you had both v_v so moot point here.
> Well, it really makes things like :
> m(_i,_j) = m(_i+1,_j+1) * n(_j,_i);
> really easy to implement. Other nice things is :
> m( (3 < _i < 5) && ( _j % 3) ) = value;
> and other boolean based acces. You can also impelemnt matrix-matrix
> acces in a pinch. aka
> matrix<float> x;
> matrix<int> u;
> x(u) = ...;
> More over it has no side effect on performances so using it or not is
> always good.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk