Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-14 14:01:52
on 14.08.2009 at 21:56
joel wrote :
>> for big sizes it might be better i agree
> And ofr comple idnexing too. I'll let you as an exercice write the one
> dimension indexign of a matrix that is tiled in 5x5 blocks and unrolled
> by a factor 3.
>> so i guess there should be at least two versions of storages
> Well, either you let it as a policy or you can use it everytime.
> The 2D case is the worst case but as benchmarks show, it's only a few
> There a was a discussion about multi_array months ago where I posted a
> sample benchmark of this.
still what about small dynamically alocated entities? i like them very
much! i'm afraid about bad performance of them
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk