Re: [boost] different matrix library?

Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: joel (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-15 02:26:01

Edward Grace wrote:
> Sure.  Just because we can doesn't mean we should.  Then again, when 
> you look at some of Boost 'because we can' could well be the battle 
> cry!  The profits, once the minefield of development is negotiated, 
> may well be surprising and unexpected.  It's now been demonstrated 
> that various C++ techniques and deep abstraction not only don't impact 
> performance but can yield excellent performance and vastly improve 
> expressibility.
> I think, and am sure you agree, expressibility is the number one 
> concern.  Being able to write code that is clear and concise under the 
> domain of interest (e.g. linear algebra) is compelling; if it's 
> implemented in a suitable manner high performance will come for free!
Beware of over-engineering. THis kidnof featrues can be added after the 
core engine works.

-- 
___________________________________________
Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor
PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI
Tel : [phone]