Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: joel (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-17 05:16:13
Rutger ter Borg wrote:
> Ok. I am looking through the documentation of version 2, there are things I
> like, and some things to lesser extend, mainly because it tries to mimic
That's the design rationale of NT2. Main use case is : take a .M, get a
.cpp, compile, ???, profit.
> Have you considered creating a more C++-like domain-specific
> language, taking elements from various domain-specific languages?
We started yes. But NT2 is a two men work, so it took times. But in the
end, the goal is to have a flexible code base for "optimized computation
on N-D table" and plug-in domain-specific interface on top of this. My
main research topic is all about that, I just need time+people ;)
-- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk