Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: joel (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-17 08:08:46
> I don't quite understand why you wouldn't want a DSL like MATLAB?
> After all, MATLAB remember is essentially FORTRAN with different
> horseshoes, that's why so many scientific / engineering types pick it
> up so fast - there is very little that's new to learn.
> For example,
> Is the above MATLAB or FORTRAN? How would you express this in C++
> (note the aliasing)? Perhaps
> or some-such? How about,
NT2 v3.0 says exactly that : alpha(range(2,10))=alpha(range(1,9));
> (Again, is that MATLAB or is it FORTRAN?)
> Presumably something like:
> vec=matrix_row<matrix<double> >(mat,4); // uBlas style.
NT2 v3.0 says : vec=mat(_,4)
> In my humble opinion, for C++ to really take off in next generation
> scientific applications (believe me I'd love to see it happen), the
> language should keep out of the way. Ultimately application writers
> just want the answer - they really don't want to have to figure out
> how the minutiae of template meta-programming works.
> Get 'em in the door first with an easy to use intuitive interface --
> once they are on board you can break out the hard stuff, then they
> will be hooked for life! ;-)
Massive agreement here :o
-- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk