Re: [boost] different matrix library?

Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-17 09:29:18

on 17.08.2009 at 17:17
 Rutger ter Borg wrote :
> Indeed, it should be easy to write. Just as an example, a function "solve"
> would already cover a large portion of the whole of LAPACK. A DSL for linear
> algebra does not need to be complex. The more expressiveness, the better, I
> would say.

just to summarize all the discussion above i say that a clear design
goes first
e.g. "x = solve(A, b);" can be a design statement telling that "the user
want to do it that way!"
only THEN comes an implementation wich can be whatever you come up
with

-- 
Pavel