Subject: Re: [boost] [move][container] Fast-track reviews for Move and Container?
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-17 11:56:35
Thomas Klimpel escribió:
> But I have a question about Boost.Move: Because the problem
> Boost.Move addresses is so important, and Boost.Move wasn't around,
> my existent code uses efficient implementations of "swap" as a
> substitute. The documentation shows that Boost.Move can be used to
> implement an efficient swap. But what about the other direction? Can
> Boost.Move exploit an existent efficient swap?
Boost.Move calls user defined constructors to operate, so you can
implement your move constructors using your efficient swap:
: ...() //Empty construction
Ditto for move assignment:
Type & operator=(BOOST_RV_REV(Type) t)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk