Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: joel (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-18 13:33:41
16x16 up to 1024x1024
> taking a closer look i'd say this test is not fully representative
> because you consider only access time regardless of
> allocation/deallocation effort
In general, what's important is the time I spend computing.
allocation/desallocation are done once and has no meaning what so ever
w/r to the speed of computation.
> can you extend it to involve a allocated/deallocated temporary or
Just add a timer for timing the allocation.
-- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk