|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: Rutger ter Borg (rutger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-18 16:26:58
joel wrote:
> Except it has limited functions support, no architectural support.
> Anyway, let's the OP do what it want anyway. I know I won't dump 4 years
> of works.
What do you mean by architectural support? I don't think my suggestion
implies that you would have to abandon your entire code base.
Cheers,
Rutger
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk