Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: Rutger ter Borg (rutger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-18 16:26:58
> Except it has limited functions support, no architectural support.
> Anyway, let's the OP do what it want anyway. I know I won't dump 4 years
> of works.
What do you mean by architectural support? I don't think my suggestion
implies that you would have to abandon your entire code base.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk