Re: [boost] different matrix library?

Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-21 10:50:25

on 20.08.2009 at 23:48
 joel wrote :

> DE wrote:
>> then a whole template must be a friend of another template (to grant 
>> access to inner structure)
> Who talked about friend ??? Those function can be implemented without 
> any friend and so no problem on encapsulation.
> Time to get coffee for you I think...
it was time to go to bed actually

but since a matrix object provides general interface even for, say,
sparse matrix, how a specialization can figure out how it should
perform on an object with general interface AND perform efficiently?

-- 
Pavel