Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-21 10:50:25
on 20.08.2009 at 23:48
joel wrote :
> DE wrote:
>> then a whole template must be a friend of another template (to grant
>> access to inner structure)
> Who talked about friend ??? Those function can be implemented without
> any friend and so no problem on encapsulation.
> Time to get coffee for you I think...
it was time to go to bed actually
but since a matrix object provides general interface even for, say,
sparse matrix, how a specialization can figure out how it should
perform on an object with general interface AND perform efficiently?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk