Re: [boost] wait-free fast-pathed, bounded-time, 100% starvation-free rw-mutex...

Subject: Re: [boost] wait-free fast-pathed, bounded-time, 100% starvation-free rw-mutex...
From: Chris M. Thomasson (cristom_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-23 12:20:02

"Andrey Semashev" <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:4A912F5D.1030503_at_gmail.com...
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
>> news:h6q8ii$fds$1_at_ger.gmane.org...
>>> "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
>>> news:h6oi3t$jds$1_at_ger.gmane.org...
>>> [...]
>>>>> However, I'd like to see Anthony's opinion on this.
>>>>
>>>> I hope he thinks it's worthy because IMHO Boost has no room for crappy 
>>>> synchronization algorithms...
>>>
>>> I am awaiting approval of my subscription request for the `Boost.Thread' 
>>> mailing list. I have had many conversations with Anthony over on 
>>> `comp.programming.threads' and I think he might like what I have to 
>>> offer.
>>>
>>> ;^)
>>
>> I have posted a query over on the Boost threads development group. So, 
>> this conversation should be transferred over there if and when my post 
>> finally appears on the list. Sorry about not posting it there first!
>>
>> ;^/
>
> Could you point a link to that discussion?

I will as soon as it gets posted. I am using NNTP and the gmane 
portal/gateway to access the mailing list and the post has not shown up yet 
on my end.

> And, IMHO, this is the right place to get things into Boost, anyways...

Okay. Well, I am new to this process (e.g., proposing new synchronization 
primitives to Boost) so please excuse my ignorance.