Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-24 11:45:19
on 24.08.2009 at 10:51
joel wrote :
> Well, you are aware that the first thign is not even writable as it's
> nto a valid c++ type.
since you don't reveal "what it actually is" of what you mean
i'm leaved to guess that thing
maybe i'm not able to guess 100% of that
and maybe i write the crapiest crap, so what?
you leave no other option
> As far from now, I'll refrain posting on this thread as it looks like a
> discussion for C++.moderated.
> Come back when you know what you are talking about and when you have a
> proper implementation to show.
i don't blame you
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk