Re: [boost] [move][container] Review Request (new versions of Boost.Move and Boost.Container in sandbox and vault)

Subject: Re: [boost] [move][container] Review Request (new versions of Boost.Move and Boost.Container in sandbox and vault)
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-24 13:09:36

Jeffrey Hellrung escribió:

> I would prefer it as is, but I haven't had a need for iterator 
> stability.  I thought the point of a flat_map/flat_set was to be an 
> as-lightweight-as-possible generic associative container, but still with 
> reasonable (O(log n)) lookup time.
> 
> Perhaps a policy-based approach is possible, or an entirely separate 
> class, e.g., stable_flat_xxx?

Yes, I was thinking about an entirely separate class.

> - Jeff

Best,

Ion