Subject: Re: [boost] [move][container] Review Request (new versions of Boost.Move and Boost.Container in sandbox and vault)
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-24 13:09:36
Jeffrey Hellrung escribió:
> I would prefer it as is, but I haven't had a need for iterator
> stability. I thought the point of a flat_map/flat_set was to be an
> as-lightweight-as-possible generic associative container, but still with
> reasonable (O(log n)) lookup time.
> Perhaps a policy-based approach is possible, or an entirely separate
> class, e.g., stable_flat_xxx?
Yes, I was thinking about an entirely separate class.
> - Jeff
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk