Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review: Boost.Polygon starts today August 24, 2009
From: Barend Gehrels (barend_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-25 12:55:27
Simonson, Lucanus J wrote:
> Andreas Fabri wrote:
>> In the BoostCon paper you make a benchmark with, among others, the
>> Boolean operations
>> of CGAL, the Computational Geometry Algorithms Library. Which of the
>> two packages did you use:
> This one.
> My friend Barend Gehrels [Barend.Gehrels_at_[hidden]] also has several countires for the geographic database that CGAL fails on. You might be able to get them from him quite easily.
I confirm that I've done a benchmark using several geometry libraries,
including Boost.Polygon, CGAL and ggl. It is not yet published. But I
will give some feedback soon, also in the scope of this Formal Review. I
encountered some counties not being accepted by CGAL, but lateron
discovered that some (at least one county) was indeed invalid. So I have
to recheck what is the problem there and in the other cases, the
shapefile or the library. I will come back to this.
>> I would be glad to check your claim that CGAL failed on one of your
>> data sets.
>> Are your benchmark testdrivers for the various libs under the boost
>> svn, or can you
>> post them, or send them in a private mail.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk