Subject: Re: [boost] : different matrix library?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-27 12:13:37
on 27.08.2009 at 19:54
Maurizio Vitale wrote :
> Seems like you're determined to keep this thread alive beyond
> reason. May I humbly suggest that at least you do the following before
> - read the text you're answering to
> - make yourself familiar with the relevant literature
> Had you done so, you would, maybe, discovered that:
> - a common multiple is not a common number, although they have
> common in common.
> - more, a common multiple of a tiling shape is not even a number
> (although it can represented by one in R^n).
> - last, that people have written about this profusely and
> googling for a few keywords would be a good idea.
thanks to your patience to write all this for me
i always confuse LCM and GCD
sorry for that and sorry for confusing you
i meant a common number in a sense that it is ordinary, natural to use
but not that it is a prime (did i get it right?)
> Other than that, yes, 3 is a rather common number. Not as nice as my
> personal favourite, 42, though.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk