Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-27 12:33:56
on 27.08.2009 at 20:09
joel wrote :
>> but still i think that these things belong to operations rather than
> Maybe but it leads to ugly syntax and well, having them on objects and
> composing them can be solved with simple rules and operations on AST.
i consider it's, again, a matter of tastes
but thanks for listetning to me anyway
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk