Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] enabling/disabling floating point exceptions
From: Peter Foelsche (peter_foelsche_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-31 13:38:48

Next message: Cory Nelson: "Re: [boost] Boost.MapReduce: what next?"
Previous message: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] [type_traits] adding is_less_comparable<T>, etc."
In reply to: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] enabling/disabling floating point exceptions"
Next in thread: Paul A. Bristow: "Re: [boost] enabling/disabling floating point exceptions"

"Gennadiy Rozental" <rogeeff_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:loom.20090831T112312-339_at_post.gmane.org...

>> everything else is not portable.
>
> Definitely. I am looking to create portable interface. Maybe in future it
> can be
> standardized.

I really do not understand, why on UNIXs the signal() problem was kept
instead of mapping this into something useful like exceptions.
This really needs to be put into the standard.

Next message: Cory Nelson: "Re: [boost] Boost.MapReduce: what next?"
Previous message: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] [type_traits] adding is_less_comparable<T>, etc."
In reply to: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] enabling/disabling floating point exceptions"
Next in thread: Paul A. Bristow: "Re: [boost] enabling/disabling floating point exceptions"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk