Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review: Boost.Polygon starts today August 24, 2009
From: John Phillips (phillips_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-01 23:17:19


Barend Gehrels wrote:
> This is a difficult one, the one that I wanted to avoid indeed, so I
> omitted it from my reply. As a Boost-user, always working with and
> interested in geometry, this library in its current form is of no use
> for me. But of course, I'm part of the team of another geometry library,
> having most of this one and more... so why would I use this one...
> Therefore I feel I can't vote.
>
>
> Regards, Barend
>

   Barend,

   Inside the Boost review process, you are quite welcome to vote. It is
a good idea for you to make sure such mitigating factors as you list are
clear in your review, and it is the review manager's job to decide how
that should affect the weight given to your vote.

                        John Phillips
                        Review Wizard


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk