Subject: [boost] optional<optional<T>>
From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrei_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-02 22:43:10
I'm defining an "optional" type for D's standard library modeled
similarly to Boost.optional. An interesting question came up - should
optional<optional<T>> fold itself into optional<T>, or is "double
optional" an interesting concept of its own?
I thought I'd ask here because by now there's a significant body of
experience with optional<T>. I perused the online documentation and the
forum and couldn't find information about that specific detail.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk