Re: [boost] optional<optional<T>>

Subject: Re: [boost] optional<optional<T>>
From: Richard Webb (richard.webb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-03 05:45:11

OvermindDL1 wrote:
> 
> 
> Slightly off-topic, but I consider D to be a *fascinating* language,
> kind of like how C++ should have been.  It would actually be *much*
> easier to create Spirit in D then it would have been in C++, and you
> could have used real PEG syntax instead of C++/D'ifying it. 
> 
> 

I've been looking at D a bit myself recently, and i just saw this on the D
mailing list:
http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-announce/2009-August/013978.html
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/optional%3Coptional%3CT%3E%3E-tp25268985p25272737.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.