Subject: Re: [boost] Failures for GCC 4.4.1 with gnu++0x
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-05 12:59:37
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Beman Dawes<bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> What about a macro "#define nullptr 0" that is only defined if the
> compiler does not support C++0x nullptr? It usually is a really bad
> idea to give a macro a lowercase name, but isn't this a really special
> case because nullptr is a C++0x keyword?
Never mind. It would break existing code. Google code search shows
people already using the name, presumably in workarounds in
preparation for 0x.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk