Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest request for pointer+bit compression optimization
From: Edouard A. (edouard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-07 16:16:27

>This is incorrect. The pointer limit is only limited to under 0x80000000 if
>you are linking without the /LARGEADDRESSAWARE flag. It is quite common to
>use this flag to enable the best performance of a 32-bit application on a
>64-bit version of Windows. It can also have some benefit when using the
>boot.ini /3GB tuning.

Yes there is the possibility to expand the user space to 3GB at the cost of
global system performance and system instability (hope your drivers aren't
assuming anything about the address of the buffers in the irps they'll get
;) although if I remember correctly to get the WHQL certification you need
to run in 3GB so if you have WHQL drivers you should be fine) on Windows
32-bit (the infamous /3GB switch you mentioned).

I forgot that Windows 64 32-bit VM automatically expanded the user space to
3GB when the switch was on. That's safer in this context as the drivers deal
with 64-bit address and all requests go through the VM.

Anyway, I don't mean to argue about the ideal size of the user space in
Windows 32, you're right the library should be able to be detect whether or
not a 32-bit application has got 3GB or 2GB space.

> On 64-bit OSes you really can use the large pointers to store data and
> therefore have very compact structures in memory. Correct me if I'm wrong
> but currently most OSes only allow several gigabytes of virtual memory for
> any given user process (something like 100-200 GB), that means there's
> for expression! :D
>The limit is as high as 8TB on some Windows 64-bit Operating Systems.

You're right! I was mixing up virtual and physical memory limits. That's the
amount of physical memory that is limited to 128 GB (mmm I see you can even
load up 2 TB on the datacenter edition, having your whole movie collection
in memory is some sort of major feature methinks :p).

That leaves (in theory) around 21 bits to store information.

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4403 (20090907) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at