Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost.Breakable] Any interest in a Boost Breakable library?
From: Vicente Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-08 10:39:14
David Abrahams-3 wrote:
> on Mon Sep 07 2009, Alexander Nasonov <alnsn-AT-yandex.ru> wrote:
>> Mathias Gaunard wrote:
>>> What about using a lambda?
>>> [&]() -> void
>>> That kind of thing can also be made with macros instead of lambdas using
>>> a similar technique to that of Boost.ScopeExit.
>> Is there still an interest in local fuctions with ScopeExit-like
> I'm interested.
> Dave Abrahams
> BoostPro Computing
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
I'm interested too,
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Boost.Breakable--Any-interest-in-a-Boost-Breakable-library--tp25318903p25347531.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk