Subject: Re: [boost] [warnings] Are warnings acceptable artifacts from builds?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-08 16:37:59
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Stewart, Robert<Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Stewart,
>> Robert<Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> > Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> >> Insisting to fix warnings is somewhat insulting to the
>> >> author of the
>> >> library, too. It presumes that they did something
>> >> unreasonable, when
>> >> in fact the warning itself may be unreasonable.
>> > The warning may, in fact, be unreasonable, but the library
>> > author should do all possible to quiet the warning.
> For the reasons I already gave.
To address someone's preference?
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk