Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [warnings] Are warnings acceptable artifactsfrom builds?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-08 17:40:09

Next message: troy d. straszheim: "Re: [boost] [cmake] revision 50756 failed to merge some file properties"
Previous message: Pierre Morcello: "Re: [boost] [Boost.Breakable] Any interest in a Boost Breakable library?"
In reply to: Kenny Riddile: "Re: [boost] [warnings] Are warnings acceptable artifactsfrom builds?"
Next in thread: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] [warnings] Are warnings acceptable artifactsfrom builds?"

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Kenny Riddile<kfriddile_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Boost has certain coding standards does it not? How is this different than
> agreeing on acceptable and unacceptable warnings on supported compilers?

Sure, the guidelines can be extended, I'm all for reaching an agreement.

Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.
http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode

Next message: troy d. straszheim: "Re: [boost] [cmake] revision 50756 failed to merge some file properties"
Previous message: Pierre Morcello: "Re: [boost] [Boost.Breakable] Any interest in a Boost Breakable library?"
In reply to: Kenny Riddile: "Re: [boost] [warnings] Are warnings acceptable artifactsfrom builds?"
Next in thread: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] [warnings] Are warnings acceptable artifactsfrom builds?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk