Subject: Re: [boost] [warnings] Are warnings acceptable artifacts from builds?
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-09 02:11:05
Robert Ramey wrote:
> warnings vary with compilers. It's a huge amount of extra work
> to eliminate all warnings in all compilers. And in many cases
> "fixing" warnings really amounts to "hiding" warnings (e.g.
> using a cast) so "fixing" them is worse than leaving them.
I think this is rather sloppy position, and the current pile of
warnings produced when building Boost clearly gives a negative
light to otherwise high-quality library.
Note all that eliminating all warnings in all compilers is not
required -- release tests are run with a few compilers, basically
msvc and gcc. Surely, promising no warnings for a compiler that is
not even tested would be too much, but promising no warnings for
the few officially supported compilers seems like reasonable approach.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk