Subject: Re: [boost] [warnings] Are warnings acceptable artifactsfrom builds?
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-09 03:08:05
Edouard A. wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:54:03 +0400, Vladimir Prus
> <vladimir_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Heh. I frankly never understood what this guideline means, unless we plan
>> to require that new libraries have their source code printed in a book
>> and sent for review by snail mail.
> I really think this requirement should go as well.
BTW, I was talking about fixed font requirement above. The 80-character requirement
seems reasonable to me and certainly the *meaning* of that requirement is clear.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk