Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [cmake] revision 50756 failed to merge some fileproperties
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-09 12:38:01


----- Original Message -----
From: "Vladimir Prus" <vladimir_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [cmake] revision 50756 failed to merge some fileproperties

> joaquin_at_[hidden] wrote:
>
>>
>> Would it be possible to set up a regression runner that uses CMake
>> instead of Boost.Build
>> so that problems with CMake are treated the same way as "regular" problems?
>
> Why should this be the case? CMake is experimental, and it seems wrong to promote
> problems with experimental anything to regular problems. I think we also have SCons setup
> for Boost -- should that be also regression tested, and problems treated as regular?
 
Hi Volodya,

there is a differnce: Boost.CMake is already delivered with the Boost releases, even if not reviewed.

Vicente


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk