Subject: [boost] Property Tree imperfection. Was: C++ Manifesto
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-11 06:40:46
> As an example, consider the library 'property tree'. Its interface and
> implementation weren't and aren't perfect but they solve a real-world
> problem in the absence of an alternative. There was a lot of debate that
> an imperfect library perhaps shouldn't be part of Boost. Thankfully it
> got accepted and thanks to Sebastian for moving it forward recently.
We had quite a good review IMO. What do you think it wrong with the library?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk