Re: [boost] doxygen doc / STL container unit test

Subject: Re: [boost] doxygen doc / STL container unit test
From: Stefan Strasser (strasser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-16 13:44:32

Am Wednesday 16 September 2009 17:20:21 schrieb Kim Barrett:
> At 5:48 PM +0200 9/16/09, Stefan Strasser wrote:
> >the parameters in the jamfile do end up in the doxygen configuration file,
> > but it seems that doxygen ignores a lot of parameters for its XML output,
> > like hide undoc members. which makes sense, because a XML processor can
> > take care of that.
> >but it doesn't, so two libraries I've looked at encapsulate all private
> >declarations in /// @cond ... /// @endcond tags.
>
> In case this hasn't already been checked, is doxygen's EXTRACT_PRIVATE
> parameter set to NO?

yes, the doxygen parameters must be right, because I enabled doxygen html 
output and the html came out alright.
but as I've said above, doxygen seems to export all elements to XML and the 
boost XSLT translation doesn't seem to care about "private".