Subject: Re: [boost] review request: addition to type_traits library of is_less_comparable<T, U> and others
From: FrÃ©dÃ©ric Bron (frederic.bron_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-09 11:30:27
> what about:
> is_less_than_comparable and has_operator_less_than
> first check for existance and bool compliance, second check for existence
Sounds very good to me.
has_operator_less_than or has_less_than_operator?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk